- From: Rachel Andrew <rachelandrewuk@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 05:36:31 +0100
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> > So with some prompting from Rachel Andrews I finally did that today. :) very happy to see this. > > Except, as per usual, I ran into some issues. > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-grid-1/#gutters > > Issue 1: Should 'normal' (the initial value of 'row-gap') compute to '0'? > > I say yes, since this would be simpler for authors. Other opinions welcome. I agree. > > Issue 2: Should we have a shorthand? What should it be called? > ('border-spacing' is unavailable because it inherits) > > Please go ahead and bikeshed this one… I prefer grid-gap to track-gap (as suggested in other comments) based on the current spec as the properties control the entire grid. There were earlier discussions - and I believe why this was originally punted to level 2 - around wether authors would want to be able to specify gutters of differing widths. I’ve not really come up with a good use case for that, but if that were ever a possibility then track-gap might make more sense as we’d need to specify some sort of pattern for tracks as opposed to one column/row gap to rule them all. > > Issue 3: Should the 'grid' shorthand reset the gap properties? > > I say yes, because we want shorthands to give a "blank slate" for related > properties, and resetting the grid should probably also reset the gutters. yes, I think so too. -- Rachel Andrew http://www.rachelandrew.co.uk http://twitter.com/rachelandrew
Received on Wednesday, 17 June 2015 04:37:09 UTC