- From: Javier Fernandez <jfernandez@igalia.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:51:22 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hi, On 06/16/2015 03:44 AM, fantasai wrote: > So with some prompting from Rachel Andrews I finally did that today. :) > I think this addition is great, just mention that a similar effect can be done via Content Distribution alignment, but having something to add directly to the grid syntax would be more powerful, indeed. > Except, as per usual, I ran into some issues. > > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-grid-1/#gutters > > Issue 1: Should 'normal' (the initial value of 'row-gap') compute to '0'? > > I say yes, since this would be simpler for authors. Other opinions > welcome. Yes, I agree it'd be the best option. I wonder, though, which effect it would have an 'auto' value for this property. I mean, trying not to be redundant with Content Distribution alignment. > > Issue 2: Should we have a shorthand? What should it be called? > ('border-spacing' is unavailable because it inherits) > > Please go ahead and bikeshed this one... track-margin ? > > Issue 3: Should the 'grid' shorthand reset the gap properties? > > I say yes, because we want shorthands to give a "blank slate" for > related > properties, and resetting the grid should probably also reset the > gutters. > Sounds sensible to me, > Comments welcome~ > Should we have any overflow handling logic for these gaps ? Perhaps something similar to what Box Alignment provides, so we can reduce proportionally all gaps to fit in container's size.
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 07:52:17 UTC