- From: Javier Fernandez <jfernandez@igalia.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 09:51:22 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hi,
On 06/16/2015 03:44 AM, fantasai wrote:
> So with some prompting from Rachel Andrews I finally did that today. :)
>
I think this addition is great, just mention that a similar effect can
be done via Content Distribution alignment, but having something to add
directly to the grid syntax would be more powerful, indeed.
> Except, as per usual, I ran into some issues.
>
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-grid-1/#gutters
>
> Issue 1: Should 'normal' (the initial value of 'row-gap') compute to '0'?
>
> I say yes, since this would be simpler for authors. Other opinions
> welcome.
Yes, I agree it'd be the best option. I wonder, though, which effect it
would have an 'auto' value for this property. I mean, trying not to be
redundant with Content Distribution alignment.
>
> Issue 2: Should we have a shorthand? What should it be called?
> ('border-spacing' is unavailable because it inherits)
>
> Please go ahead and bikeshed this one...
track-margin ?
>
> Issue 3: Should the 'grid' shorthand reset the gap properties?
>
> I say yes, because we want shorthands to give a "blank slate" for
> related
> properties, and resetting the grid should probably also reset the
> gutters.
>
Sounds sensible to me,
> Comments welcome~
>
Should we have any overflow handling logic for these gaps ? Perhaps
something similar to what Box Alignment provides, so we can reduce
proportionally all gaps to fit in container's size.
Received on Tuesday, 16 June 2015 07:52:17 UTC