- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 22:15:51 +0200
- To: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 3:34 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> On 08/25/2015 06:11 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote: >>> If one goes beyond ASCII at all, I really don't see a good reason not >>> to include all Unicode whitespace characters. And with my author hat >>> on, I think selectors probably *should* consistently use "all Unicode >>> whitespace characters" as their definition of white space. >> >> I think we only really care here about what CSS considers white space >> and will collapse away. >> >> Which is not all Unicode Zw characters. > > "Everything that white-space:normal will collapse" seems like a > reasonable rule too, but why should *that* not be "all Zw characters"? Because it doesn't have a good reason to go beyond ASCII at all. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 25 August 2015 20:16:39 UTC