Re: [will-change] Should will-change trigger stacking context when the property does not apply to an element?

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Simon Fraser <> wrote:

> Comparing with WebKit’s list, I think you’re missing opacity.

It is implemented properly but it was missing the bit
This has been fixed[1].

During testing, I also noticed that Firefox treats “will-change:
> will-change;” as valid, which the spec says it should not.

 I've filed a bug for this [2].


Received on Tuesday, 18 August 2015 17:45:05 UTC