Re: [will-change] Should will-change on non-animatable properties create stacking context?

On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:

> "will-change” is obviously geared towards hints regarding properties that
> can be animated.
>
> However, the stacking context-creation side-effects of will-change aren’t
> restricted to
> animatable properties. According to the spec, "will-change: position” and
> "will-change: transform-style” both create SC.
>
> Is this desired behavior? I’m not sure I see any benefit of having
> will-change create
> SC for non-animatable properties.
>

mix-blend-mode is a non-animatable property and it would be nice if an
author wouldn't have to resort to stacking context creating tricks when
applying a blend mode.