W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2014

Re: [css-font-loading] feedback

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 11:45:55 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78hybnPtP5aLHwpToGGSGTxXUXVkcvxY0P2sR=Pbar+=vA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
>> Well, DOM defines DOMException at the moment so it would be *the*
>> specification to check for usage.
>> And in particular what I pointed you to is exactly what you want to do
>> here. Reject with a DOMException object whose name is x, message is
>> some user agent-defined value, and code is set per the table.
> That's what I want to do, yes, but not what I want to type.  Can we
> add a prose hook somewhere that defines "reject with a FooError
> exception" as the above?  You mention WebIDL maybe doing this, but I'd
> think it appropriate for DOM to do it too.

I could update DOM, but I don't see why we wouldn't wait a few months
for the proper fix. At that point everyone will have to update their
text anyway as I'll have removed the relevant bits.

Received on Thursday, 29 May 2014 09:46:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:43 UTC