Re: [css-font-loading] feedback

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 9:44 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> wrote:
>> Well, DOM defines DOMException at the moment so it would be *the*
>> specification to check for usage.
>>
>> And in particular what I pointed you to is exactly what you want to do
>> here. Reject with a DOMException object whose name is x, message is
>> some user agent-defined value, and code is set per the table.
>
> That's what I want to do, yes, but not what I want to type.  Can we
> add a prose hook somewhere that defines "reject with a FooError
> exception" as the above?  You mention WebIDL maybe doing this, but I'd
> think it appropriate for DOM to do it too.

I could update DOM, but I don't see why we wouldn't wait a few months
for the proper fix. At that point everyone will have to update their
text anyway as I'll have removed the relevant bits.


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/