Re: [selectors] what is the combinator '/' IDENT '/'

On 2014-05-22 04:30, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:57 AM, fantasai
> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>> On 05/21/2014 01:43 PM, Simon Sapin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 21/05/2014 19:51, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> But also has been discussed as a generalized way to fit conceptual named
>>>>> combinators like it.
>>>>
>>>> And in particular, is the/deep/  combinator.  Simon, mind reverting
>>>> your removal?
>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, I didn’t remember /deep/. Done.
>>
>>
>> Didn't we just agree to rename /deep/ to >>>?
>
> We also agreed previously, though, that /ident/ is how we'd do future
> combinators, so no need to remove it now.
>
> ~TJ
>

As pointed out in previous messages, if the '/' IDENT '/' branch is part 
of the grammar, there should at least be an "official" name for that 
combinator and a (short) description for it, even a simple one that just 
refers to a future version of the spec.

Is "named combinator" the currently endorsed name?

Received on Thursday, 22 May 2014 08:58:35 UTC