- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:30:33 +0900
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:57 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 05/21/2014 01:43 PM, Simon Sapin wrote: >> >> On 21/05/2014 19:51, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >>>> >>>> But also has been discussed as a generalized way to fit conceptual named >>>> combinators like it. >>> >>> And in particular, is the/deep/ combinator. Simon, mind reverting >>> your removal? >> >> >> Oh, I didn’t remember /deep/. Done. > > > Didn't we just agree to rename /deep/ to >>>? We also agreed previously, though, that /ident/ is how we'd do future combinators, so no need to remove it now. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2014 02:31:21 UTC