- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:15:36 -0800
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 03/04/2014 09:12 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > I don't particularly care which venue moves box-decoration-break forward, > but whichever path gets to REC fastest would be preferred by the TTWG and > Cox. It just seems to me that B&B3 is further along the path. The box-decoration-break property was moved forward partly because it has less implementation experience than the rest of CSS3BG and largely because it fits better in the Fragmentation module anyway. I don't understand why it's critical to move it so long as both specs are in CR. Backgrounds and Borders is there already (effectively), and Fragmentation is almost there. If there's some kind of problem that requires them being in REC rather than CR, then what is it? Is someone threatening patent litigation? ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 5 March 2014 08:16:03 UTC