Re: [css3-background] Restore box-decoration-break

I don't particularly care which venue moves box-decoration-break forward,
but whichever path gets to REC fastest would be preferred by the TTWG and
Cox. It just seems to me that B&B3 is further along the path.

Regards,
Glenn


On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:

> On 3/4/14, 11:45 AM, "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Simon Sapin
> ><simon.sapin@exyr.org> wrote:
> >
> >On 04/03/2014 19:06, Glenn Adams wrote:
> >
> >Cox would like to see box-decoration-break restored to this
> >specification rather than postponed to Level 4.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >The property is not postponed to Backgrounds and Borders Level 4, it has
> >been moved to the Fragmentation module:
> >
> >http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-break/#break-decoration
> >
> >
> >
> >ok, thanks for correcting that; in any case, Cox is concerned that moving
> >it into another spec will delay it being published in a final (REC) form,
> >as compared to leaving it in B&B3
>
> Backing up a bit, I believe both B&B3 and Fragmentation are very close to
> LC. I don’t think there’s a significant delay involved in placing this
> break property with the other break properties. We should just get both of
> these modules moving along.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan
>
>