- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 14:39:33 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:59 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > [ Please change the Subject: line when replying to minutes if it's > not about a correction to the minutes. ] > > On Thursday 2013-03-28 11:16 -0700, Ojan Vafai wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:15 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>wrote: >> > - RESOLVED: We copy the behaviour of % margins/paddings from grid to >> > flexbox: they are relative to their respective dimension, >> > not always the inline dimension (as in block layout) >> >> Was not supporting % margins/paddings on both grid and flexbox considered? >> It seems to me a mistake that we support them on blocks, but it's a mistake >> we're stuck with. > > It wasn't. > > What would you do with such margins and padding? Treat them as > zero? I don't think it makes sense to not support them. We don't have anything better to do with percentages, and can define them to resolve against a value that might be useful. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 28 March 2013 21:40:24 UTC