On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:59 AM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> > wrote: > > [ Please change the Subject: line when replying to minutes if it's > > not about a correction to the minutes. ] > > > > On Thursday 2013-03-28 11:16 -0700, Ojan Vafai wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:15 PM, fantasai < > fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>wrote: > >> > - RESOLVED: We copy the behaviour of % margins/paddings from grid to > >> > flexbox: they are relative to their respective > dimension, > >> > not always the inline dimension (as in block layout) > >> > >> Was not supporting % margins/paddings on both grid and flexbox > considered? > >> It seems to me a mistake that we support them on blocks, but it's a > mistake > >> we're stuck with. > > > > It wasn't. > > > > What would you do with such margins and padding? Treat them as > > zero? > That's what I had in mind. > I don't think it makes sense to not support them. We don't have > anything better to do with percentages, and can define them to resolve > against a value that might be useful. > Might theoretically be useful is not a great reason to support something if it's not *actually* useful. We'll all need extra code to handle this. It's not hard...but it's more code, more tests, etc. without any use-case. OjanReceived on Friday, 29 March 2013 00:00:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:27 UTC