- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 13:10:16 -0700
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > Maybe we need to fork this discussion... Initial question was: Is that > the case (as you described above)? It seems the answer is yes - that > is the intent. Given that, I would just like to quickly note that at > a minimum the names don't seem to indicate that to me. Larger comment > is: Do we really *have* to do that or can we find a way to let them > "largely work" in CSS and make that be what we mean by "profile" > instead -- sort of "this is the *potentially* really slow stuff".. Avoiding a situation where browsers feel obligated to implement them in a way that "largely works" is the precise reason we forbid CSS from getting the complete profile. If any browser finds a way to implement them that works correctly and is sufficiently fast, we'll just move the features from "complete" to "fast". ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 20:11:03 UTC