- From: Paul Nelson (ATC) <paulnel@winse.microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 05:26:31 -0800
- To: "fantasai" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "WWW International" <www-international@w3.org>, <www-style@w3.org>
I'll write a proposed draft for this area next week and submit it to the lists for comment. An entire document on justification could be written that would help people understand expansion opportunities, compression, etc. I don't know that it makes it any more or less compelling to implement. However, I think that if the information is worth keeping around it should be done right. Paul ________________________________ From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] Sent: Fri 2/23/2007 6:32 PM To: Paul Nelson (ATC) Cc: WWW International; www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: CSS3 Text - Edit suggestions Paul Nelson (ATC) wrote: > I liked Asmus' suggestion to make the information a UTN. Wouldn't that make it seem /more/ important for an implementor to implement, than merely letting it sit in an old draft of CSS3 Text with a note that says "to be deleted because it's inappropriate in modern typography"? ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 23 February 2007 13:30:24 UTC