- From: Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 23:11:00 -0400
- To: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, W3c I18n Group <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
Martin,
thanks for the comments.
I guess I don't understand why the behavior for UND doesn't need to be
mentioned.
Aren't specifications better when they precisely define behavior?
I guess I like even my unknowns nicely organized... ;-)
tex
Martin Duerst wrote:
> >3) The reference to 2070 should be upgraded to rfc 3066.
> >Also, what should occur if the empty language tag is specified for the
> >language
> >in XML? Use the default conversion or perform no conversion? What if the
> >tag is
> >"UND"?
>
> I don't think we need to mention 'UND'. For missing/empty language tags,
> the default conversion is fine.
>
> Regards, Martin.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Tex Texin cell: +1 781 789 1898 mailto:Tex@XenCraft.com
Xen Master http://www.i18nGuy.com
XenCraft http://www.XenCraft.com
Making e-Business Work Around the World
-------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 16 October 2003 23:11:01 UTC