- From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 12:02:50 -0400
- To: Tex Texin <tex@i18nguy.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, W3c I18n Group <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
At 23:11 03/10/16 -0400, Tex Texin wrote: >Martin, > >thanks for the comments. > >I guess I don't understand why the behavior for UND doesn't need to be >mentioned. Because nobody recommends to use UND in any place. The special case is not to have any language information, either by absence of any tags, or by xml:lang=''. >Aren't specifications better when they precisely define behavior? Yes, but I guess saying something like 'if you don't have enough information, use the default mappings' should be good enough. Regards, Martin.
Received on Friday, 17 October 2003 14:39:10 UTC