- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 01:36:15 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hi, In addition to my earlier comments to http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-css3-text-20010517 general: I miss a definition of the keywords "may", "must", etc., some W3C technical reports reference RFC 2119, this should be done here, too. It would be helpful for authors not familiar to terms used throughout the specification to include a little dictionary for these terms, e.g. 'glyph', 'kerning', 'writing system' and 'character repertoire' There are _editor's_ notes in red and green and I got no idea what the different colors are supposed to tell me figure 3.2.8: the asterisk is ambigous here, there are two definitions of what the astersik stands for and one could not distinguish between those two section 7.1: it's "U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN" without a white-space between U+ and 00AD section 8.4: "p { width :100px; margin-top : 50px; margin-left : 50px; }" all CSS Level 3 modules should share the same CSS writing style, so this should be at least p { width: 100px; margin-top: 50px; margin-left: 50px } or p { width: 100px; margin-top: 50px; margin-left: 50px; } text-overflow-ellipsis: <ellipsis-end> reads: "In a horizontal text flow ('writing-mode' = 'lr-tb) [...]" this must be ... ('writing-mode: lr-tb') section 12.1 "[HTML40]" is no hyperlink; one too much 'language-specific' in the same paragraph references: [RUBY] has become a recommendation lately section 3.5: "Use the first character descendant[, after any reordering due to ^^^ ? character direction and bi-directionality,] which has an unambiguous ^^^ ? script identifier to determine the dominant script of the element's content." -- Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de } http://www.bjoernsworld.de am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de 25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
Received on Monday, 11 June 2001 19:35:08 UTC