- From: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 10:23:37 +0000 (GMT)
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>, Terry Payne <trp@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 03:48, Libby Miller wrote: [...] > > > > Dan, did you reach any conclusions about moving the new vocab to the > > old namespace? > > I don't mean for anybody to refer to the .../rfc2445-formal schema > from their data! > > The new schema has more constraints in it, but there are only a few > small changes to the way the actual data works (enumerated values > are strings and Valarm is a component and maybe a couple others). > > i.e. the new schema is intended to describe almost the same vocabulary. > I updated the conversion tools and test data, and I plan to update > the 2002/12/cal schema itself presently, unless somebody objects. Thanks for the clarification Dan - are you going with [[ if anyone screams, within a week or so, we'll back out the changes (for further discussion) ]] http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ ? I think well worth updating. cheers Libby
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2004 05:27:43 UTC