- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 04:44:59 -0500
- To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Terry Payne <trp@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 03:48, Libby Miller wrote: [...] > > I've already created ical schedules for all the talks in the program, > > and have published them on the program web-pages (see [1]), but now > > want to create semantic equivalents for these events. Where is the > > latest version of your schedule ontology, and are there any examples? Yes, we have a little pile of test data: http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/test/ > Dan Connolly has been working on a new version of the vocabulary, > currently located here: > > http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/rfc2445-formal.rdf > > but he was thinking of replacing the old one[1] with that. > Having looked at it this week I think that the new one is much better > and should be the one to use. There was some discussion about whether > this is the right thing to do[2] which will affect the namespace used, > but I would definitely go with Dan's new one (which uses OWL and RDFS). > > Dan, did you reach any conclusions about moving the new vocab to the > old namespace? I don't mean for anybody to refer to the .../rfc2445-formal schema from their data! The new schema has more constraints in it, but there are only a few small changes to the way the actual data works (enumerated values are strings and Valarm is a component and maybe a couple others). i.e. the new schema is intended to describe almost the same vocabulary. I updated the conversion tools and test data, and I plan to update the 2002/12/cal schema itself presently, unless somebody objects. > > Also, are there any readily available tools that might be able to use > > this markup? Yes, event sherpa and cwm and various others. Anything in particular you want to do? > I already have OWL markup for all the speakers/authors, > > and all the papers, and am working on a conference ontology to pull all > > this together. However, I also need to tie together the temporal > > events. I'm hoping to publish all the OWL markup and annotate the html > > by the end of the week... Annotate the HTML? How? Have you considered GRDDL? http://www.w3.org/2003/g/data-view > > Any thoughts on the ical stuff? > > > Libby > > [1]http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical.rdf > [2]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2004Feb/0014.html > [3]http://jibbering.com/2004/foafnaut/foafnaut.templates.offline.svg?sha1=1ba3bffdd13a136d38b77542f2e26fd1dc0042f2 > (SVG) > announcement: > http://rdfweb.org/pipermail/rdfweb-dev/2004-March/012814.html > > > > > Terry > > > > [1] http://www.daml.ecs.soton.ac.uk/SSS-SWS04/Program.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2004 04:45:01 UTC