- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 05:39:37 -0500
- To: Libby Miller <Libby.Miller@bristol.ac.uk>
- Cc: Terry Payne <trp@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, www-rdf-calendar@w3.org
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 05:23, Libby Miller wrote: > On Wed, 3 Mar 2004, Dan Connolly wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 03:48, Libby Miller wrote: > > [...] > > > > > > Dan, did you reach any conclusions about moving the new vocab to the > > > old namespace? > > > > I don't mean for anybody to refer to the .../rfc2445-formal schema > > from their data! > > > > The new schema has more constraints in it, but there are only a few > > small changes to the way the actual data works (enumerated values > > are strings and Valarm is a component and maybe a couple others). > > > > i.e. the new schema is intended to describe almost the same vocabulary. > > I updated the conversion tools and test data, and I plan to update > > the 2002/12/cal schema itself presently, unless somebody objects. > > > Thanks for the clarification Dan - are you going with > > [[ > if anyone screams, within a week or so, we'll back out the changes (for > further discussion) > ]] > http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ > > ? of course. > I think well worth updating. > > cheers > > Libby -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2004 05:39:40 UTC