Tuesday, 21 June 2011
- I18N-ISSUE-64: ployglot [Polyglot]
- I18N-ISSUE-63: Named entity references [Polyglot]
- I18N-ISSUE-62: Case requirements [Polyglot]
- I18N-ISSUE-61: Mention lang and xml:lang [Polyglot]
- I18N-ISSUE-60: Omit the either/or list [Polyglot]
- I18N-ISSUE-59: BOM with utf-8 and/or utf-16 [Polyglot]
- I18N-ISSUE-58: In-document declarations always useful [Polyglot]
- I18N-ISSUE-57: UTF-16 BOM is required [Polyglot]
- More ignorable comment emails coming up ...
- Re: Algonquin
- Re: Algonquin
- Re: Algonquin
- Re: Algonquin
- RE: Algonquin
- Algonquin
- Re: Should @maxlength count 16-bits, grapheme clusters or Unicode code points?
- Re: Should @maxlength count 16-bits, grapheme clusters or Unicode code points?
Monday, 20 June 2011
- Re: Heads up: transitioning HTML5 comments to the new tracker system
- I18N-ISSUE-34: bdo element doesn't leave rendering up to presentation layer [HTML5]
- I18N-ISSUE-32: rlo and lro attribute values [HTML5]
- I18N-ISSUE-31: What's the language of a document [HTML5]
- I18N-ISSUE-30: Allow utf-16 meta encoding declarations [HTML5]
- I18N-ISSUE-29: ruby code samples [HTML5]
- I18N-ISSUE-28: Please add support for rb [HTML5]
- I18N-ISSUE-27: Please add support for rb [HTML5]
- I18N-ISSUE-26: Please add support for rb [HTML5]
- Heads up: transitioning HTML5 comments to the new tracker system
- [Bug 12242] Make UTF-16 an invalid encoding in Polyglot Markup (i18n-issue-17)
- I18N-ISSUE-25: Rendering bidi without a style sheet [HTML5]
- Re: Should @maxlength count 16-bits, grapheme clusters or Unicode code points?
- Should @maxlength count 16-bits, grapheme clusters or Unicode code points?
Wednesday, 15 June 2011
Monday, 13 June 2011
- New translations into Russian and Ukrainian
- New translations into Spanish
- Re: New translation into Hungarian
- New translation into Hungarian
Thursday, 9 June 2011
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Call for Papers: The 6th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST-2011)!
Wednesday, 8 June 2011
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
Tuesday, 7 June 2011
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Re: Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
- Should the UTF-8 BOM trump overriding via HTTP or by users?
Friday, 3 June 2011
Wednesday, 1 June 2011
Tuesday, 31 May 2011
- Re: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
Monday, 30 May 2011
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- Re: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- Re: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
Sunday, 29 May 2011
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- Re: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- Re: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- RE: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
- Re: HTML5 and Unicode Normalization Form C
Tuesday, 24 May 2011
- Re: Declaring xml:lang in a RelaxNG schema
- RE: Declaring xml:lang in a RelaxNG schema
- Re: Declaring xml:lang in a RelaxNG schema
- Declaring xml:lang in a RelaxNG schema
Friday, 20 May 2011
Wednesday, 18 May 2011
Saturday, 14 May 2011
Sunday, 8 May 2011
- RE: [css3-writing-modes] referring to Unicode
- [css3-text] text-transform misc issues (was RE: [css3-writing-modes] referring to Unicode
- [css3-writing-modes] Character's intrinsic orientation and text-orientation property (was referring to Unicode
Wednesday, 4 May 2011
- Re: [css3-writing-modes] referring to Unicode
- New translations into German
- Re: [css3-writing-modes] referring to Unicode
- Re: [css3-writing-modes] referring to Unicode
Tuesday, 3 May 2011
- RE: [css3-writing-modes] referring to Unicode
- Re: [css3-writing-modes] referring to Unicode
- New translations into Russian and Ukrainian
Monday, 2 May 2011
Sunday, 1 May 2011
Friday, 29 April 2011
Thursday, 21 April 2011
Wednesday, 20 April 2011
- Re: [css3-lists] Remaining feedback on the module
- Re: [css3-lists] Remaining feedback on the module
- Re: [css3-lists] Remaining feedback on the module
- RE: [css3-lists] Remaining feedback on the module
- Re: [css3-lists] Remaining feedback on the module
- Re: [css3-lists] Remaining feedback on the module
- Re: [css3-lists] Remaining feedback on the module
- Re: [css3-lists] Remaining feedback on the module
- RE: [css3-lists] Remaining feedback on the module
Tuesday, 19 April 2011
- [css3-lists] Remaining feedback on the module
- RE: [css3-text] New Working Draft
- New translations into Romanian
Saturday, 16 April 2011
- RE: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] New Working Draft
- Re: [css3-text] New Working Draft
Friday, 15 April 2011
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- New translations into German
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
Thursday, 14 April 2011
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- Re: [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- [css3-text] script categories, 'bicameral', 'discrete', Unicode links and more
- [css3-text] New Working Draft