css3-color disposition of comments
The following are issues raised regarding the 14 May 2003 css3-color Candidate Recommendation.
See the released and development versions of the test suite for the “Tests” references.
Issues are color-coded as follows:
| Feature to be dropped due to lack of implementation (all issues accepted) |
| Proposed new feature (all issues rejected) |
| Editorial issue |
| Minor technical issue |
| Substantive technical issue |
Issues where commenters were not satisfied with responses:
- Issue 12: Commenter objected to group's response that it would not add a new syntax when taking the CR back to last call in order to drop unimplemented features.
- Issue 16 (maybe unsatisfied): Some commenters followed up with messages of concern, although none clearly objected to the group's rejection of the issue.
Issues
- URL
- none
- Raised by
- David Baron
- Summary
- definition of attr() syntax and semantics should be removed in favor of definition in css3-values
- Resolution
- drop text in favor of css3-values
- Status
- Spec edited.
- URL
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Mar/0305.html
- Group response (and responses to it)
- Raised by
- David Baron
- Summary
- Handling of S and L values for hsl() and hsla() outside [0%, 100%] is undefined
- Resolution
- clamp to device gamut
- Status
- Spec edited.
- Tests
- t421-rgb-clip-outside-gamut-b, t422-rgba-clip-outside-device-gamut-b, t424-hsl-clip-outside-gamut-b, t425-hsla-clip-outside-device-gamut-b
- URL
- vaguely related to http://www.w3.org/mid/BA69D948.20605%25tantek@cs.stanford.edu
- Raised by
- David Baron
- Summary
- Mention interaction of colors and user style sheets again? The previous version of the draft did so, but the CR does not.
- Resolution
- no change (trying to be realistic rather than idealistic)
- URL
- none
- Raised by
- David Baron
- Summary
- Status section needs to say that comments sent to www-style should say [css3-color] in the subject.
- Resolution
- edit as described
- Status
- Document edited (as part of status section cleanup before processing issues).
- URL
- http://www.w3.org/mid/20030131034516.GA29002@gemini.baron
- Raised by
- David Baron
- Summary
- Should opacity group over elements or boxes?
- Status
- tests written (they pass per current spec)
- Resolution
- no change (withdrawn by commenter)
- Tests
- t32-opacity-offscreen-multiple-boxes-1-c, 32-opacity-offscreen-multiple-boxes-2-c, t422-rgba-onscreen-multiple-boxes-c, t425-hsla-onscreen-multiple-boxes-c
- Summary
- verify that all recent CSS 2.1 changes have been incorporated
- Raised by
- David Baron
- Status
- Done