- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 10:28:55 -0700
- To: Adam Kuehn <akuehn@nc.rr.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wednesday 2008-05-14 12:57 -0400, Adam Kuehn wrote: > In my view, this is really a philosophical question. Is the spec leading, > or following? If it is leading, this is a change worth making. If it is > just following (cataloging what exists), then it isn't. I think until the spec reaches the Candidate Recommendation stage (call for implementations), it is leading. But once we've asked for implementations, we should advance what we've asked for implementations of (or the implemented subset of it) to Recommendation, and the spec should be following the implementations. The leading should be left to the next release of the specification. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 17:29:33 UTC