- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 16:35:12 -0700
- To: "REFSTRUP,JACOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1)" <jacob.refstrup@hp.com>
- Cc: "www-style (www-style@w3.org)" <www-style@w3.org>
On Monday 2003-07-28 13:59 -0400, REFSTRUP,JACOB (HP-Vancouver,ex1) wrote: > In CSS3 Color [1] "3.2. Transparency: the 'opacity' property" the term > 'mask' is used without having a definition. After looking at SVG1.1 [2] it > seemed to me that the clipping, masking and composition model of SVG1.1, > chapter 14 was assumed (or equivalent in SVG1.0). > > Could we perhaps make a reference in [1] to this so it becomes more clear > for readers not familiar with SVG1.1? This has been recorded as http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/css3-color#issue-9 and should be fixed in the editor's draft at http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-color/#transparency and http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-color/#alpha through the reference in the latter section to SVG 1.1, section 14.2. > In thinking through how to implement it I found it useful to internalize and > learn these compositing rules and I made up an example. Perhaps an example > like this could be included in [1] to further clarify what is supposed to > happen so the implementer has something to verify his understanding against. I'm not sure how valuable this would be; there are tests in the test suite, which I think helps more. If this doesn't address your comment, could you let us know within two weeks, if possible? -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Monday, 12 May 2008 23:35:52 UTC