- From: Peter Moulder <Peter.Moulder@infotech.monash.edu.au>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 15:15:28 +1000
- To: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 05:04:09PM -0700, L. David Baron wrote: > This has been recorded as > http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/css3-color#issue-19 and has been > addressed in the editor's draft at > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-color/#svg-color by adding the > sentence: > # This specification extends their definition beyond SVG. Can sections 4.1 and 4.3 be merged, then? Suggested title ‘Color keywords’. We could still start by listing the 16 HTML colours (or 17 CSS 2.1 colours, = HTML + orange) given that they include the most basic colours. Having a single section makes it clearer that there's no distinction in their treatment as far as css3-color is concerned. If a motivation for having separate lists is to give information on backwards compatibility, then I'd have thought it more valuable to identify the colour specifications supported by CSS 2.1 (http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/syndata.html#color-units) than those supported by HTML attributes. pjrm.
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 05:16:08 UTC