- From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 16:08:50 -0800
- To: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Cc: gdaniels@macromedia.com, Paul Kulchenko <paulclinger@yahoo.com>, W3C Public Archive <www-archive@w3.org>
Do you mean itemType? I don't see a nodeType AII specified anywhere in recent drafts. Martin Gudgin wrote: > > Glen, Mark, Paul, > > The XMLP WG are very interested in your response to these questions. If > you could provide this information before next Wednesday ( which is when > the XMLP WG have their next telcon meeting ) that would be great! > > Thanks > > Martin Gudgin > For the XML Protocol WG > > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com] > Sent: 07 March 2003 03:07 > To: David Fallside; Alex DeJarnatt; Jeffrey Schlimmer; John Koropchak; > akarmark@oracle.com; cunnings@lectrosonics.com; Davanum Srinivas; > david.orchard@bea.com; Don Mullen; gdaniels@macromedia.com; Jacek > Kopecky; jbaysdon@tibco.com; manoj.cheenath@bea.com; Paul Kulchenko; Sam > Ruby; xan@tibco.com; Yasser Shohoud > Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org > > > This is a request from the W3C XMLP WG for information about status of > implementations of nodeType functionality. The WG would like to know > answers to the following questions: > > A) Are you going to implement nodeType? > > B1) If the answer to A) is 'Yes', can you please give a rough idea > of when this feature would be implemented. > > B2) If the answer to A) is 'No', can you please give a rationale for > why you do not intend to implement this feature? > > Regards > > Martin Gudgin > For the XML Protocol Working Group
Received on Wednesday, 12 March 2003 19:16:38 UTC