- From: Martin Gudgin <mgudgin@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 05:32:24 -0800
- To: "Mark Nottingham" <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Cc: <gdaniels@macromedia.com>, "Paul Kulchenko" <paulclinger@yahoo.com>, "W3C Public Archive" <www-archive@w3.org>
In the CR draft[1] it was actually called valueType ( due to an editorial snafu ). In the latest ed copy[2] it's called nodeType. Sorry for the confusion. Gudge [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2002/CR-soap12-part2-20021219/ [2] http://www.w3.org/2000/xp/Group/2/06/LC/soap12-part2.xml > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:mark.nottingham@bea.com] > Sent: 13 March 2003 00:09 > To: Martin Gudgin > Cc: gdaniels@macromedia.com; Paul Kulchenko; W3C Public Archive > > Do you mean itemType? I don't see a nodeType AII specified > anywhere in recent drafts. > > > Martin Gudgin wrote: > > > > Glen, Mark, Paul, > > > > The XMLP WG are very interested in your response to these > questions. If > > you could provide this information before next Wednesday ( > which is when > > the XMLP WG have their next telcon meeting ) that would be great! > > > > Thanks > > > > Martin Gudgin > > For the XML Protocol WG > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Martin Gudgin [mailto:mgudgin@microsoft.com] > > Sent: 07 March 2003 03:07 > > To: David Fallside; Alex DeJarnatt; Jeffrey Schlimmer; John > Koropchak; > > akarmark@oracle.com; cunnings@lectrosonics.com; Davanum Srinivas; > > david.orchard@bea.com; Don Mullen; gdaniels@macromedia.com; Jacek > > Kopecky; jbaysdon@tibco.com; manoj.cheenath@bea.com; Paul > Kulchenko; Sam > > Ruby; xan@tibco.com; Yasser Shohoud > > Cc: xml-dist-app@w3.org > > > > > > This is a request from the W3C XMLP WG for information > about status of > > implementations of nodeType functionality. The WG would like to know > > answers to the following questions: > > > > A) Are you going to implement nodeType? > > > > B1) If the answer to A) is 'Yes', can you please give a rough idea > > of when this feature would be implemented. > > > > B2) If the answer to A) is 'No', can you please > give a rationale for > > why you do not intend to implement this feature? > > > > Regards > > > > Martin Gudgin > > For the XML Protocol Working Group > > >
Received on Thursday, 13 March 2003 08:32:34 UTC