- From: Katie Haritos-Shea <ryladog@earthlink.net>
- Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 22:37:03 -0400
- To: "William Loughborough" <love26@gorge.net>
- Cc: "3WC WAI X-TECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Good point, William..............I'll fix that. The talk in Boston seemed to center around some kind of permanent dating system, if it is to be normative. I am all for having this be dated as we go along, what do you all think we should do at this point?..................Katie You are never asleep at the wheel are you William? Take care.................Katie -----Original Message----- From: William Loughborough [mailto:love26@gorge.net] Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2001 10:32 PM To: ryladog@earthlink.net; 3WC WAI X-TECH Cc: Charles McCathieNevile; Wendy Chisholm Subject: Re: WAI Glossary New URL At 09:54 PM 5/5/01 -0400, Katie Haritos-Shea wrote: >Glossary. I don't know if this has already been worried to death but... If the glossary has "acronym" in it (which includes "abbreviation" in its definition), it should have "abbreviation" in it - particularly since it's the basis for a tag of some sort? If this is the latest working draft, why is it dated 10 February? -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2001 22:39:41 UTC