- From: William Loughborough <love26@gorge.net>
- Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 19:32:14 -0700
- To: <ryladog@earthlink.net>, "3WC WAI X-TECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
- Cc: "Charles McCathieNevile" <charles@w3.org>, "Wendy Chisholm" <wendy@w3.org>
At 09:54 PM 5/5/01 -0400, Katie Haritos-Shea wrote: >Glossary. I don't know if this has already been worried to death but... If the glossary has "acronym" in it (which includes "abbreviation" in its definition), it should have "abbreviation" in it - particularly since it's the basis for a tag of some sort? If this is the latest working draft, why is it dated 10 February? -- Love. ACCESSIBILITY IS RIGHT - NOT PRIVILEGE
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2001 22:31:10 UTC