- From: Charles McCathieNevile <charlesmccn@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Oct 1998 17:51:22 -0700 (PDT)
- To: jongund@uiuc.edu
- Cc: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Jon, I am sending this to you because my normal email has temprorarily died, and I am not sure how open the list is. Two comments about the proposed setup: 1. The GL rating P3 wa changed to 'this guideline may be implemented to improve access...' giving a MUST/SHOULD/MAY classification which could be related directly to the three priority grades. Should UA be looking at something similar? 2. The 'compatibility with assistive technology' sounds pretty woolly to me. Are we talking about stuff that we ought to be expecting from the DOM being passed from the browser itself to the assistive technology, or are we asking everyone to implement Microsoft's Active Accessibility, or some other standard already in existence? It seems to me that we should be specifying a standard interface for functions we are not requiring of the browser itself. Charles McCathieNevile _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Sunday, 11 October 1998 20:49:18 UTC