- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@staff.uiuc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1998 09:46:16 -0500
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Guideline ratings and interpretation. I would like to get some discussion on current guideline rating system. In past telecons the issue has been raised about mainstream borwsers, specialized browsers and 3rd party assitive technology compatibility. Does our current rating system reflect concerns of these three groups? Do we want to change the following definitions? Rating and Classification Each guideline is classified according to the following rating system: [Priority 1] This guideline must be implemented, or one or more groups of users will find it impossible to access information in the document. Implementing this guideline is a basic requirement for some groups to be able to use WWW documents. [Priority 2] This guideline should be implemented, or one or more groups of users will find it difficult to access information in the document. Implementing this guideline will significantly improve access to WWW documents. [Priority 3] This guideline should be implemented to make it easier for one or more groups of users to access information in the document. Implementing this guideline will improve access to WWW documents. Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: 217-244-5870 Fax: 217-333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund http://www.als.uiuc.edu/InfoTechAccess
Received on Friday, 9 October 1998 10:47:25 UTC