- From: Roomy Naqvy <roomynaqvy@123india.com>
- Date: 13 Dec 2000 04:45:00 -0800
- To: duerst@w3.org
- Cc: w3c-translators@w3.org
Dear Martin Thanks for your reply. I think if there is a Unicode version for Indic scripts that's the best thing to happen. I just have to find it somewhere. On Tue, 12 December 2000, "Martin J. Duerst" wrote: > > Hello Roomy, > > At 00/12/12 08:36 -0800, Roomy Naqvy wrote: > >Dear Martin > > > >Thanks for your response. I went to http:/www.w3.org/TR and then went to > >http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml [XML 1.0], http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/ > >[HTML 4.01 Specification], http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/ [XHTML 1.0: The > >Extensible Hypertext Markup Language] and to > >http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/ [Web Content Accessibility Guidelines]. > > > >I understand all these would count as specifications and could be translated. > > Correct. If there is anything else on http://www.w3.org which you would > want to translate, you would have to ask for permission (rather than, > as for specifications, to just notify us). > > > >Now, the first query, Gujarati does not have the Latin-Western character > >set. So how d ______________________________________________________ 123India.com - India's Premier Portal Get your Free Email Account at http://www.123india.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 December 2000 07:46:14 UTC