w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org from April to June 1999 by author

Barb Fox (Exchange)

• RE: Some possible rqmt/design points (Thursday, 17 June)
• RE: Some possible rqmt/design points (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Some possible rqmt/design points (Tuesday, 15 June)

Bob Smart

• Re: Namespace treatment for C14N (Wednesday, 9 June)

Bugbee, Larry

• RE: Signed-XML (revised) ("Electronic" Signature in RD) (Saturday, 26 June)
• Signed-XML (revised) (Thursday, 24 June)
• Signed-XML (Thursday, 24 June)
• Signed-XML and White Space? (Thursday, 24 June)
• Signed-XML and White Space? (Thursday, 24 June)
• Another requirements question (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Requirements questions (Wednesday, 16 June)

David Burdett

• RE: Chair Request: Final Comments Submissions to RD (Friday, 11 June)

David Solo

• Re: Some possible rqmt/design points (Thursday, 17 June)
• Re: Some possible rqmt/design points (Thursday, 17 June)
• Re: Some possible rqmt/design points (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Some possible rqmt/design points (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Some possible rqmt/design points (Tuesday, 15 June)

dee3@us.ibm.com

• Re: Fw: Fw: CNN - U.S. committees approve encryption bill - June 25, 1999 (Monday, 28 June)
• Re: Reference to the Brown's draft (Tuesday, 22 June)
• Re: Namespace treatment for C14N (Tuesday, 8 June)
• Re: Namespace treatment for C14N (Monday, 7 June)

Donald E. Eastlake 3rd

• Chair Announce:XMLDSIG meeting at the 45th IETF meeting in Oslo (Monday, 7 June)

Gerald Oskoboiny

• test of new list (Saturday, 1 May)

Hiroshi Maruyama

• Re: Three Issues for C14N Consideration (Thursday, 24 June)
• RE: Three Issues for C14N Consideration (Tuesday, 22 June)
• Re: Three Issues for C14N Consideration (Saturday, 19 June)
• Namespace treatment for C14N (Monday, 7 June)

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org

• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-signature-comments-00.txt (Wednesday, 30 June)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-signature-00.txt (Tuesday, 29 June)
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-xmldsig-requirements-00.txt (Wednesday, 23 June)

John Boyer

• Re: Three Issues for C14N Consideration (Thursday, 17 June)
• Re: Another requirements question (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Requirements Feedback: Solving a Security Hole and the Namespace Resolution Problem (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Clarification on URIs (Friday, 11 June)
• Re: Chair Request: Final Comments Submissions to RD (Friday, 11 June)
• Re: Chair Request: Final Comments Submissions to RD (Friday, 11 June)

Joseph M. Reagle Jr.

• Recommended Reading and Proposals for Addition in RD (Tuesday, 29 June)
• Re: Schema/DTD represented in sig? (Friday, 25 June)
• Re: [Moderator Action] Re: Signed-XML (revised) ("Electronic" Signature in RD) (Friday, 25 June)
• Re: Signed-XML and White Space? (Friday, 25 June)
• Re: Signed-XML (revised) ("Electronic" Signature in RD) (Friday, 25 June)
• Published Requirements Document (Thursday, 24 June)
• Re: Three Issues for C14N Consideration (Thursday, 24 June)
• C14n and XML declaration? (Wednesday, 23 June)
• Re: Three Issues for C14N Consideration (Monday, 21 June)
• Chair Request: W3C AC Vote Closes Tomorrow (Monday, 21 June)
• Re: Requirements questions (Friday, 18 June)
• Three Issues for C14N Consideration (Thursday, 17 June)
• Re: Some possible rqmt/design points (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Clarification on URIs (XLink & XPtr) (Tuesday, 15 June)
• Re: Chair Request: Final Comments Submissions to RD (Monday, 14 June)
• Re: Chair Request: Final Comments Submissions to RD (Monday, 14 June)
• Re: Clarification on URIs (Monday, 14 June)
• Re: Clarification on URIs (Friday, 11 June)
• Chair Request: Final Comments Submissions to RD (Friday, 11 June)
• Minutes:1999.06.09 XML Syntax WG (Wednesday, 9 June)
• Re: Namespace treatment for C14N (Tuesday, 8 June)
• Re: Namespace treatment for C14N (Monday, 7 June)
• XML Infoset (Minutes:1999.06.02 XML Syntax WG) (Thursday, 3 June)
• CR: Volunteer to Liason on xHTML Forms (Tuesday, 1 June)
• CR: Inclusion in WG List (Tuesday, 1 June)
• CR: Proposals for Requirements Document (RD) (Tuesday, 1 June)
• CA: Working Group Up and Running / Conventions for WG Management (Tuesday, 1 June)
• Re: XML Schema and the necessity for canonical representations (Wednesday, 26 May)
• The XML-DSig List (Wednesday, 26 May)

Phillip H. Griffin

• Re: Namespace treatment for C14N (Tuesday, 8 June)

Phillip M Hallam-Baker

• RE: Some possible rqmt/design points (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Some possible rqmt/design points (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Some possible rqmt/design points (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Some possible rqmt/design points (Tuesday, 15 June)

Ralph R. Swick

• Schema/DTD represented in sig? (Wednesday, 23 June)

Richard D. Brown

• RE: Three Issues for C14N Consideration (Monday, 21 June)
• RE: Some possible rqmt/design points (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Some possible rqmt/design points (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Some possible rqmt/design points (Wednesday, 16 June)
• RE: Clarification on URIs (Tuesday, 15 June)
• RE: Namespace treatment for C14N (Thursday, 10 June)

Richard Himes

• Re: Chair Request: Final Comments Submissions to RD (Friday, 11 June)

Shinsuke Honjo

• RE: Another requirements question (Wednesday, 23 June)

Todd.Glassey@Meridianus.Com

• Fw: Fw: CNN - U.S. committees approve encryption bill - June 25, 1999 (Monday, 28 June)
• Re: Signed-XML and White Space? (Thursday, 24 June)

TSG - Meridianus

• Re: Another requirements question (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Some possible rqmt/design points (Wednesday, 16 June)
• Re: Chair Request: Final Comments Submissions to RD (Sunday, 13 June)

Winchel 'Todd' Vincent, III

• Re: Signed-XML (revised) ("Electronic" Signature in RD) (Friday, 25 June)
• Re: Schema/DTD represented in sig? (Thursday, 24 June)
• Re: Some possible rqmt/design points (Thursday, 17 June)
• Re: Chair Request: Final Comments Submissions to RD (Friday, 11 June)

Yoshiaki KAWATSURA

• Reference to the Brown's draft (Tuesday, 22 June)

Last message date: Wednesday, 30 June 1999 08:56:24 UTC