- From: Richard D. Brown <rdbrown@GlobeSet.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 14:09:16 -0500
- To: "'Joseph M. Reagle Jr.'" <reagle@w3.org>, <dee3@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Joseph, You cannot use the URI String directly. The URI string might not respect the Name construct that is mandated by the XML-namespace specification (see Qname). Therefore, if you use the URI String, the canonical representation would not be valid XML. On the other hand, the proposal made by Don and Hiroshi does abide by the 'fixed point property' and leads to valid XML. BEFORE CANONICALIZATION <dsig:element xmlns:dsig='http://w3c-xmldsig'> CANONICAL REPRESENTATION assuming 0125FC23D.. := MD5(http://w3c-xmldsig) <_0125FC23D..:element xmlns:_0125FC23D..='http://w3c-xmldsig'> SECOND CANONICALIZATION same assumption <_0125FC23D..:element xmlns:_0125FC23D..='http://w3c-xmldsig'> Notice that the canonical representation is valid XML and abides by the 'fixed point property.' Sincerely, Richard D. Brown Software Architect - R&D GlobeSet, Inc. Austin, TX - U.S. > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Joseph M. Reagle > Jr. > Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 1999 1:35 PM > To: dee3@us.ibm.com > Cc: w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > Subject: Re: Namespace treatment for C14N > > > At 12:14 PM 6/8/99 -0400, dee3@us.ibm.com wrote: > >It's the hash of the URI, not the hash of what the URI points to. > > That's how I first read it and thought, "that doesn't abide > by the 'fixed > point property.' " But I thought, why bother? So I reread the > following > "expanded" > > > >2. Hex coding of MD5 of the Expanded URI is used as the > new prefix. > > to read fetch the resource for security; which still didn't > abide by the > fixed point property. > > A hash of a hash will still be a different hash regardless if > the first was > generated from the URI string or it's resource. > > So: > 1. Why bother with a hash of the URI string? Why not use the URI? > 2. Is it worth losing "fixed point" because of it? > > _________________________________________________________ > Joseph Reagle Jr. > Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org > XML-DSig Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/ >
Received on Thursday, 10 June 1999 15:11:33 UTC