- From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 11:05:26 -0400
- To: "TSG - Meridianus" <Todd.Glassey@www.meridianus.com>, "David Burdett" <David.Burdett@MONDEX.com>
- Cc: "IETF/W3C XML-DSig WG" <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
At 09:13 AM 6/13/99 -0700, TSG - Meridianus wrote:
>We should also note the DRI payments group too and Todd Vincent's XML Court
>Projects.
My intent was not to point out related activities, but to point out other
specific requirements documents as examples of good/interesting RDs: the
scope, how they do it, etc. It now reads:
>The following documents are not necessarily related to XML Signature, but
are
>interesting examples of other WG requirements documents.
However, recalling identified activities is a good idea, and I added a
section, taken from the charter with Todd's proposal of XML-Legal as the TBD:
Coordination
1. The XML Signature specification should meet the requirements of the
following applications:
Internet Open Trading Protocol v2.0 [Charter]
2. Legal XML [List]
3. Financial Services Mark Up Language v2.0 [Charter]
The XML Signature specification must be reviewed by the following
communities:
1. XML Syntax WG [Charter]
2. XML Linking WG [Charter]
3. XML Schema WG [Charter]
4. Metadata CG [Charter]
_________________________________________________________
Joseph Reagle Jr.
Policy Analyst mailto:reagle@w3.org
XML-DSig Co-Chair http://w3.org/People/Reagle/
Received on Monday, 14 June 1999 11:06:06 UTC