public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org from November 2006 by thread

[Bug 3990] [Guidelines] Content in Section 5.7 is unclear bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3990] [Guidelines] Content in Section 5.7 is unclear bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3979] [Guidelines] Clarify guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy expressions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3978] [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3989] [Guidelines] Suggested Format bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3988] [Guidelines] Section 8 Doesn't Illustrate How to Design an Assertion bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3987] [Guidelines] Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3985] [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3986] [Guidelines] Parameter vs. Nested Policy Decision at Domain Level? bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3985] [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3984] [Guidelines] Assertion Parameters vs. Name Value Pairs bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3983] [Guidelines] Use 'Assertion Author (s)' Consistently bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3981] [Guidelines] Section 4 Relevance to Assertion Design bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3980] [Guidelines] Should Assume Basic Understanding of WS-Policy bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3978] [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3979] [Guidelines] Clarify guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy expressions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3979] [Guidelines] Clarify guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy expressions bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3978] [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 18 November)

[Bug 3793] Add example about policies in the context of relationships between multiple entities bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 15 November)

[Bug 3966] Inconsistency in Primer re: PolicyReference Extensibility bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 15 November)

[Bug 3792] section 4 of the primer overlaps with the guidelines document bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Monday, 13 November)

[Bug 3809] Primer uses an Assertion that does not exist bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 9 November)

[Bug 3966] Inconsistency in Primer re: PolicyReference Extensibility bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 9 November)

[Bug 3619] add an inssue on coordination with other working groups bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 9 November)

[Bug 3789] Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 9 November)

[Bug 3721] New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 9 November)

[Bug 3961] Editorial error in framework section 4.1example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 9 November)

[Bug 3965] Clarify text surrounding PolicyReference and for usage of wsp:Name attribute bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Thursday, 9 November)

[Bug 3564] Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 8 November)

[Bug 3961] Editorial error in framework section 4.1example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 8 November)

[Bug 3962] No media type has been assigned to ws-policy. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 8 November)

[Bug 3962] No media type has been assigned to ws-policy. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 8 November)

[Bug 3730] External WS-Policy Attachment to WSDL 2.0 components bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 8 November)

[Bug 3599] Need a URI structure to refer to WSDL 1.0 definitions, etc. bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 8 November)

[Bug 3961] Editorial error in framework section 4.1example bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 8 November)

[Bug 3894] Definition of equivalence for WSDL 2.0 component model {policy} properties bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 8 November)

[Bug 3953] Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 4 November)

[Bug 3952] Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer) bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Saturday, 4 November)

[Bug 3794] Section 3 overlap of primer with guidelines bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 1 November)

[Bug 3795] Section 2.4- usefulness bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 1 November)

[Bug 3791] primer/guidelines overlap bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org (Wednesday, 1 November)

Last message date: Saturday, 18 November 2006 03:00:14 UTC