public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org from November 2006 by author

bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org

• [Bug 3990] [Guidelines] Content in Section 5.7 is unclear (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3990] [Guidelines] Content in Section 5.7 is unclear (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3979] [Guidelines] Clarify guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy expressions (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3978] [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3989] [Guidelines] Suggested Format (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3988] [Guidelines] Section 8 Doesn't Illustrate How to Design an Assertion (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3987] [Guidelines] Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions? (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3985] [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3986] [Guidelines] Parameter vs. Nested Policy Decision at Domain Level? (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3985] [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3984] [Guidelines] Assertion Parameters vs. Name Value Pairs (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3983] [Guidelines] Use 'Assertion Author (s)' Consistently (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3981] [Guidelines] Section 4 Relevance to Assertion Design (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3980] [Guidelines] Should Assume Basic Understanding of WS-Policy (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3978] [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3979] [Guidelines] Clarify guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy expressions (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3979] [Guidelines] Clarify guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy expressions (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3978] [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary (Saturday, 18 November)
• [Bug 3793] Add example about policies in the context of relationships between multiple entities (Wednesday, 15 November)
• [Bug 3966] Inconsistency in Primer re: PolicyReference Extensibility (Wednesday, 15 November)
• [Bug 3792] section 4 of the primer overlaps with the guidelines document (Monday, 13 November)
• [Bug 3809] Primer uses an Assertion that does not exist (Thursday, 9 November)
• [Bug 3966] Inconsistency in Primer re: PolicyReference Extensibility (Thursday, 9 November)
• [Bug 3619] add an inssue on coordination with other working groups (Thursday, 9 November)
• [Bug 3789] Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester (Thursday, 9 November)
• [Bug 3721] New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies (Thursday, 9 November)
• [Bug 3961] Editorial error in framework section 4.1example (Thursday, 9 November)
• [Bug 3965] Clarify text surrounding PolicyReference and for usage of wsp:Name attribute (Thursday, 9 November)
• [Bug 3564] Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances (Wednesday, 8 November)
• [Bug 3961] Editorial error in framework section 4.1example (Wednesday, 8 November)
• [Bug 3962] No media type has been assigned to ws-policy. (Wednesday, 8 November)
• [Bug 3962] No media type has been assigned to ws-policy. (Wednesday, 8 November)
• [Bug 3730] External WS-Policy Attachment to WSDL 2.0 components (Wednesday, 8 November)
• [Bug 3599] Need a URI structure to refer to WSDL 1.0 definitions, etc. (Wednesday, 8 November)
• [Bug 3961] Editorial error in framework section 4.1example (Wednesday, 8 November)
• [Bug 3894] Definition of equivalence for WSDL 2.0 component model {policy} properties (Wednesday, 8 November)
• [Bug 3953] Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains (Saturday, 4 November)
• [Bug 3952] Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer) (Saturday, 4 November)
• [Bug 3794] Section 3 overlap of primer with guidelines (Wednesday, 1 November)
• [Bug 3795] Section 2.4- usefulness (Wednesday, 1 November)
• [Bug 3791] primer/guidelines overlap (Wednesday, 1 November)

Last message date: Saturday, 18 November 2006 03:00:14 UTC