Saturday, 18 November 2006
- [Bug 3990] [Guidelines] Content in Section 5.7 is unclear
- [Bug 3990] [Guidelines] Content in Section 5.7 is unclear
- [Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors
- [Bug 3979] [Guidelines] Clarify guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy expressions
- [Bug 3978] [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary
- [Bug 3989] [Guidelines] Suggested Format
- [Bug 3988] [Guidelines] Section 8 Doesn't Illustrate How to Design an Assertion
- [Bug 3987] [Guidelines] Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions?
- [Bug 3985] [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec
- [Bug 3986] [Guidelines] Parameter vs. Nested Policy Decision at Domain Level?
- [Bug 3985] [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec
- [Bug 3984] [Guidelines] Assertion Parameters vs. Name Value Pairs
- [Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors
- [Bug 3983] [Guidelines] Use 'Assertion Author (s)' Consistently
- [Bug 3982] [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors
- [Bug 3981] [Guidelines] Section 4 Relevance to Assertion Design
- [Bug 3980] [Guidelines] Should Assume Basic Understanding of WS-Policy
- [Bug 3978] [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary
- [Bug 3979] [Guidelines] Clarify guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy expressions
- [Bug 3979] [Guidelines] Clarify guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy expressions
- [Bug 3978] [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary
Wednesday, 15 November 2006
- [Bug 3793] Add example about policies in the context of relationships between multiple entities
- [Bug 3966] Inconsistency in Primer re: PolicyReference Extensibility
Monday, 13 November 2006
Thursday, 9 November 2006
- [Bug 3809] Primer uses an Assertion that does not exist
- [Bug 3966] Inconsistency in Primer re: PolicyReference Extensibility
- [Bug 3619] add an inssue on coordination with other working groups
- [Bug 3789] Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester
- [Bug 3721] New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies
- [Bug 3961] Editorial error in framework section 4.1example
- [Bug 3965] Clarify text surrounding PolicyReference and for usage of wsp:Name attribute
Wednesday, 8 November 2006
- [Bug 3564] Optional Assertions may not be usable in all circumstances
- [Bug 3961] Editorial error in framework section 4.1example
- [Bug 3962] No media type has been assigned to ws-policy.
- [Bug 3962] No media type has been assigned to ws-policy.
- [Bug 3730] External WS-Policy Attachment to WSDL 2.0 components
- [Bug 3599] Need a URI structure to refer to WSDL 1.0 definitions, etc.
- [Bug 3961] Editorial error in framework section 4.1example
- [Bug 3894] Definition of equivalence for WSDL 2.0 component model {policy} properties
Saturday, 4 November 2006
- [Bug 3953] Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains
- [Bug 3952] Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer)