[Bug 3981] [Guidelines] Section 4 Relevance to Assertion Design

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3981

           Summary: [Guidelines] Section 4 Relevance to Assertion Design
           Product: WS-Policy
           Version: FPWD
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: Windows XP
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Guidelines
        AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
        ReportedBy: asirveda@microsoft.com
         QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org


Title: What is the relevance of Section 4 'Authoring Styles' to policy
assertion design?

Description: The Guidelines document is for assertion authors. Section 4
describes the compact and normal forms for policy expressions. Compact vs.
normal form ('Authoring Styles') is not relevant to policy assertion design.
WS-Policy Primer describes the compact and normal forms for policy expressions.

Justification: The Guidelines document should focus on guidelines for policy
assertion authors. 'Authoring Styles' is not in the minimum to declare victory
on the Guidelines document.

Target: Guidelines for Policy Assertion Authors.

Proposal: Drop Section 4.

[1]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-guidelines.html?rev=1.8&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#compact-full

Received on Saturday, 18 November 2006 01:19:47 UTC