- From: Matthew Raymond <mattraymond@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:59:40 -0500
Klotz, Leigh wrote: >> Explain to me why Web Forms 2.0 shouldn't be "incorporating more of >> the great ideas" in XForms-Tiny rather than the other way around. Why is >> your approach to cannibalize an existing W3C working draft to enrich a >> draft you haven't even finished yet? What, in your opinion, makes WF2 >> unsalvageable? > > Or what makes you want to cannibalize an existing W3C Recommendation > which predates the formation of WHAT-WG? Are you trying to justify hypercannibalization?!? Or are you just trying to cover up the fact that XForms and WF2 don't occupy the same niche, but XForms-Tiny and WF2 do?
Received on Thursday, 25 January 2007 17:59:40 UTC