Alexei Kouminov via GitHub
Anna Weine via GitHub
Bernard Aboba via GitHub
Brad Isbell via GitHub
BRAUGARDO116 via GitHub
Dominique Hazael-Massieux via GitHub
dontcallmedom-bot via GitHub
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] receiver.hardwareAcceleration attribute instead of disableHardware[En|De]coding() static method (#229) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Playback and synchronization of MediaStreamTracks created by VideoTrack Generator (#86) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Add "real-time" warning/note to VideoTrackGenerator (#20) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Remote track.getSettings().channelCount (#3011) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Opus mono/stereo and remote track channelCount (#3010) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Codec negotiation and level IDs (#3020) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: Add event for CSRC change (#230) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarify order of events when the SCTP transport is closed (#3022) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Reconsider replaceTrack's blocking on the operations queue. (#3017) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] MediaStreamTrackGenerator/MediaStream should buffer the current frame (#114) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Expectations/requirements for VideoFrame and AudioData timestamps (#80) (Wednesday, 20 November)
Eddy via GitHub
Elad Alon via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consideration of proposal to join captureWheel() and setZoomLevel() (#24) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Closed: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consideration of proposal to join captureWheel() and setZoomLevel() (#24) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider limiting element types (#28) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Closed: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider limiting element types (#28) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Address click-jacking concerns (#41) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consideration of proposal to support zoom in/out (#40) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Address click-jacking concerns (#41) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Supporting zoom via gesture forwarding (#43) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is setting a specific zoom level part of the MVP? (#44) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#45) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] How capturer web applications can know whether forwarding is working/useful (#46) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Should a web page allow to select specific types of event to be forwarded and not others (#47) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider dropping permission for captured surface control APIs (#48) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Tab capture control (#49) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Consideration of proposal to support zoom in/out (#40) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the order of events being track clones? (#1020) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the order of events being track clones? (#1020) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the order of events being track clones? (#1020) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Friday, 8 November)
- [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Consideration of proposal to support zoom in/out (#25) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#20) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#20) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#20) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#20) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Address click-jacking concerns with capture control (#24) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Address click-jacking concerns with capture control (#24) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Consider dropping permission for captured surface control APIs (#14) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#23) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Address click-jacking concerns with capture control (#24) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Spec says to send black frames for ended tracks (#3014) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Spec should be more explicit about exposure of deviceId (#306) (Monday, 4 November)
Erik Språng via GitHub
Florent Castelli via GitHub
fuzzy-coats via GitHub
guidou via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the purpose of requiring a successful gUM call before enumerateDevices? (#1019) (Saturday, 23 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the purpose of requiring a successful gUM call before enumerateDevices? (#1019) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the purpose of requiring a successful gUM call before enumerateDevices? (#1019) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: Add event for CSRC change (#230) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Thursday, 7 November)
Harald Alvestrand via GitHub
henbos via GitHub
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Align spec /w codec direction decision (#3006) (Thursday, 28 November)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos (Thursday, 28 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Filter codecs preferences on transceiver direction (#3018) (Thursday, 28 November)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add remote track channelCount (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [webrtc-svc] RTCRtpSender.getCapabilities() should include scalability_modes in returned codec list (#105) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Closed: [webrtc-svc] RTCRtpSender.getCapabilities() should include scalability_modes in returned codec list (#105) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Allow level-id to be different in codec match (#3023) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Allow level-id to be different in codec match (#3023) (Friday, 22 November)
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by henbos (Thursday, 21 November)
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] DataChannel connected step needs to queue a task (#3015) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Allow level-id to be different in codec match (#3023) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Allow level-id to be different in codec match (#3023) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Allow level-id to be different in codec match (#3023) (Thursday, 21 November)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Allow level-id to be different in codec match (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Codec negotiation and level IDs (#3020) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing resolution attributes from simulcast `addTransceiver` `sendEncodings` API enabling (#3019) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing resolution attributes from simulcast `addTransceiver` `sendEncodings` API enabling (#3019) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Missing resolution attributes from simulcast `addTransceiver` `sendEncodings` API enabling (#3019) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Opus mono/stereo and remote track channelCount (#3010) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Opus mono/stereo and remote track channelCount (#3010) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Opus mono/stereo and remote track channelCount (#3010) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] receiver.hardwareAcceleration attribute instead of disableHardware[En|De]coding() static method (#229) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Codec negotiation and level IDs (#3020) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: Add event for CSRC change (#230) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: Add event for CSRC change (#230) (Monday, 18 November)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: Add event for CSRC change (#230) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Filter codecs preferences on transceiver direction (#3018) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: Add event for CSRC change (#230) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Codec filter in SDP should consider lower level-id as subsets of greater level-id (#3020) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Codec filter in SDP should consider lower level-id as subsets of greater level-id (#3020) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Codec filter in SDP should consider lower level-id as subsets of greater level-id (#3020) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- [webrtc-pc] Codec filter in SDP should consider lower level-id as subsets of greater level-id (#3020) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Add definitions of corruption detection measurement statistics (#787) (Thursday, 7 November)
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by henbos (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add definitions of corruption detection measurements (#788) (Thursday, 7 November)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Filter codecs preferences on transceiver direction (Thursday, 7 November)
Jan-Ivar Bruaroey via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116) (Wednesday, 27 November)
- Closed: [mediacapture-transform] Fire a stopped event on VideoTrackGenerator if all downstream tracks are stopped (#117) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Fire a stopped event on VideoTrackGenerator if all downstream tracks are stopped (#117) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- [mediacapture-transform] Fire a stopped event on VideoTrackGenerator if all downstream tracks are stopped (#117) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the purpose of requiring a successful gUM call before enumerateDevices? (#1019) (Wednesday, 20 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the purpose of requiring a successful gUM call before enumerateDevices? (#1019) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] receiver.hardwareAcceleration attribute instead of disableHardware[En|De]coding() static method (#229) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] receiver.hardwareAcceleration attribute instead of disableHardware[En|De]coding() static method (#229) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [webrtc-extensions] Feature request: Add event for CSRC change (#230) (Friday, 15 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should we have a screenshare extension spec? (#297) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should we have a screenshare extension spec? (#297) (Thursday, 14 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Thursday, 14 November)
- [webrtc-pc] Clarify order of events when the SCTP transport is closed (#3022) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarify that datachannel close is reflected remotely (#3021) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarify that datachannel close is reflected remotely (#3021) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [webrtc-pc] Clarify that datachannel close is reflected remotely (#3021) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-surface-control] Address click-jacking concerns (#41) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Consider dropping permission for captured surface control APIs (#48) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Address click-jacking concerns (#41) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add definitions of corruption detection measurements (#788) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add definitions of corruption detection measurements (#788) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add definitions of corruption detection measurements (#788) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#20) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#20) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#20) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#20) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#20) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#20) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Address click-jacking concerns with capture control (#24) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Reconsider replaceTrack's blocking on the operations queue. (#3017) (Tuesday, 5 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Reconsider replaceTrack's blocking on the operations queue. (#3017) (Monday, 4 November)
- [webrtc-pc] Reconsider replaceTrack's blocking on the operations queue. (#3017) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Spec should be more explicit about exposure of deviceId (#306) (Friday, 1 November)
- Closed: [mediacapture-screen-share] Spec should be more explicit about exposure of deviceId (#306) (Friday, 1 November)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Queue a task for the SCTP transport connected steps. (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] DataChannel connected step needs to queue a task (#3015) (Friday, 1 November)
- [webrtc-pc] DataChannel connected step needs to queue a task (#3015) (Friday, 1 November)
Johnny Qiu via GitHub
Kemal Ozturk via GitHub
Maciej Krajewski via GitHub
Norman Wang via GitHub
Philipp Hancke via GitHub
realies via GitHub
Santiago Souto via GitHub
Tackoil via GitHub
Taylor Brandstetter via GitHub
Tove Petersson via GitHub
youennf via GitHub
- Re: [mediacapture-output] Implicit consent via getUserMedia should allow access to non-miked speakers (#147) (Friday, 29 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Fire a stopped event on VideoTrackGenerator if all downstream tracks are stopped (#117) (Tuesday, 26 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the purpose of requiring a successful gUM call before enumerateDevices? (#1019) (Friday, 22 November)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] How should be populated codecs capabilities fmtp lines? (#3024) (Thursday, 21 November)
- [webrtc-pc] How should be populated codecs capabilities fmtp lines? (#3024) (Thursday, 21 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] MediaStreamTrackGenerator/MediaStream should buffer the current frame (#114) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] Track transferability requirement adds complexity to some common use cases (#116) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-transform] What is the expected timing of MSTP video frame enqueuing with other track events (configurationchange, applyConstraints promise resolution) (#115) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- [mediacapture-transform] What is the expected timing of MSTP video frame enqueuing with other track events (configurationchange, applyConstraints promise resolution) (#115) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Tuesday, 19 November)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] Tab capture control (#49) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Should a web page allow to select specific types of event to be forwarded and not others (#47) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] How capturer web applications can know whether forwarding is working/useful (#46) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Is gesture forwarding tied to capture controller or to MediaStreamTrack (#45) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Is setting a specific zoom level part of the MVP? (#44) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Supporting zoom via gesture forwarding (#43) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [mediacapture-surface-control] [Capture control] Is it important for capture control to keep captured tab from knowing it is captured? (#42) (Wednesday, 13 November)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Packet sender receiver worker api (Tuesday, 12 November)
- [webrtc-rtptransport] Pull Request: Add RTCRtpTransportProcessor based API (Tuesday, 12 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the order of events being track clones? (#1020) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-main] What is the order of events being track clones? (#1020) (Monday, 11 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Saturday, 9 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Saturday, 9 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Saturday, 9 November)
- [mediacapture-main] What is the order of events being track clones? (#1020) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Friday, 8 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add definitions of corruption detection measurements (#788) (Thursday, 7 November)
- Re: [mst-content-hint] Should the spec provide guideline on the default degradation preference to use for capture tracks? (#60) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- [mst-content-hint] Should the spec provide guideline on the default degradation preference to use for capture tracks? (#60) (Wednesday, 6 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Monday, 4 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Friday, 1 November)
- [mediacapture-screen-share] Should screen capture tracks expose deviceId? (#308) (Friday, 1 November)
- Re: [mediacapture-screen-share-extensions] Auto-pause for Captured Surface Switching (2nd edition) (#15) (Friday, 1 November)
Last message date: Friday, 29 November 2024 15:20:31 UTC