- From: Erik Språng via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 14:34:14 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
> Reading through the thread again I see there was an effort to make it non-normative, but this part still sounds normative to me: > > * _"If the [corruption-detection](http://www.webrtc.org/experiments/rtp-hdrext/corruption-detection) header extension is present in the RTP packets, corruption probability measurements MUST be [present](https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/#map-exists)."_ In the sense that _if_ you have decided to implement support for that extensions and have negotiated it for a particular RTP stream, then it makes sense to me to say that we should surface the stats value for it. Do you have a different formulation in mind you think is more suitable? -- GitHub Notification of comment by sprangerik Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-stats/pull/788#issuecomment-2462391307 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Thursday, 7 November 2024 14:34:14 UTC