- From: henbos via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:04:11 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
@aboba You have pointed this (or something similar) out before when I didn't think about it. Does offering and answering 156 in the above example if direction=sendrecv make sense to you? (If direction is sendonly or recvonly we would still offer/answer the highest value we support in that direction, so this issue only becomes apparent when direction is sendrecv) -- GitHub Notification of comment by henbos Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/issues/3020#issuecomment-2470102892 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2024 10:04:12 UTC