Friday, 29 September 2017
Thursday, 28 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-pc] No way to tell when SCTP association is closed
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Stats & isolated streams
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] state internal slot
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Improve definition of required fields in RTCRtpParameters
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: createDataChannel: Queue a task to update negotiation needed state
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpSender.setParameters: Do we need more specific hardware encoder errors?
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
Wednesday, 27 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-stats] CPU metrics
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Do the "audio level" stats include MediaStreamTrack volume settings?
- Re: [webrtc-stats] jitterBufferDelay and concealed samples, DTX/CNG samples
- Re: [webrtc-stats] jitterBufferDelay and concealed samples, DTX/CNG samples
- Re: [webrtc-stats] jitterBufferDelay and concealed samples, DTX/CNG samples
- Re: [webrtc-stats] jitterBufferDelay and concealed samples, DTX/CNG samples
- Re: [webrtc-stats] CPU metrics
- Re: [webrtc-stats] jitterBufferDelay and concealed samples, DTX/CNG samples
- Re: [webrtc-stats] jitterBufferDelay and concealed samples, DTX/CNG samples
- Re: [webrtc-stats] jitterBufferDelay and concealed samples, DTX/CNG samples
- Re: [webrtc-stats] jitterBufferDelay and concealed samples, DTX/CNG samples
- Re: [webrtc-stats] CPU metrics
- Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats.jitterBufferDelay: Specify unit in seconds
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Is bytesReceived really available for RTCRemoteInboundRTPStreamStats?
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Stats for Audio network adaptation
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Do the "audio level" stats include MediaStreamTrack volume settings?
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Added Guidelines for getStats() results caching
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Added Guidelines for getStats() results caching
- [webrtc-stats] new commits pushed by vr000m
- Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats.concealedAudibleSamples added.
- Re: [webrtc-stats] pliCount is Picture Loss Indication, not Packet Loss Indication
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] pliCount is Picture Loss Indication, not Packet Loss Indication
- Re: [webrtc-stats] pliCount is Picture Loss Indication, not Packet Loss Indication
- [webrtc-stats] pliCount is Picture Loss Indication, not Packet Loss Indication
- Re: [webrtc-stats] jitterBufferDelay and concealed samples, DTX/CNG samples
- [webrtc-stats] jitterBufferDelay and concealed samples, DTX/CNG samples
- Re: [webrtc-stats] CPU metrics
- Re: [webrtc-stats] CPU metrics
Tuesday, 26 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-stats] CPU metrics
- [webrtc-pc] Stats & isolated streams
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Stats for Audio network adaptation
- [webrtc-stats] CPU metrics
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Ordering of stream "addtrack"/"removetrack" events vs. "track" event
Monday, 25 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Partial removal of a track?
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Privacy & Security self review
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Partial removal of a track?
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
Friday, 22 September 2017
- [webrtc-pc] No way to tell when SCTP association is closed
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Partial removal of a track?
Thursday, 21 September 2017
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Fix a typo: RTCSessionSessionDescription -> RTCSessionDescription.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] DTMF examples
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add 'resolved' (and variants) to Promise terminology
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fix a typo: RTCSessionSessionDescription -> RTCSessionDescription.
Wednesday, 20 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Added Guidelines for getStats() results caching
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Typo fix datachannelid to datachannelId
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Improve definition of required fields in RTCRtpParameters
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Typo fix datachannelid to datachannelId
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Added Guidelines for getStats() results caching
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Added Guidelines for getStats() results caching
Tuesday, 19 September 2017
- [webrtc-pc] Partial removal of a track?
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Validate protocol string in IdP operations
Monday, 18 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Meta: auto-publish changes to the spec
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: DTMF examples
- [webrtc-pc] DTMF examples
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Added Guidelines for getStats() results caching
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Added Guidelines for getStats() results caching
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Added Guidelines for getStats() results caching
Friday, 15 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Added Guidelines for getStats() results caching
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Message text not localizable
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Message text not localizable
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Message text not localizable
- [webrtc-pc] Message text not localizable
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Promise terminology is missing "resolved"
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add 'resolved' (and variants) to Promise terminology
- [webrtc-pc] Promise terminology is missing "resolved"
- Re: [webrtc-pc] setParameters: Do argument checks in sync section and specify parellel steps
- [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpSender.setParameters: Do we need more specific hardware encoder errors?
- Re: [webrtc-pc] scaleResolutionDownBy: Specify how the User Agent should behave when scaling video
Thursday, 14 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do we need a "trackremoved" event?
- [webrtc-pc] RTCDtlsTransportState enum descriptions are lacking
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpSender should have an internal slot for its track
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by burnburn
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpReceiver should have an internal slot for its track
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by burnburn
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Setting a remote description may cause discontinuity due to codec switching.
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by burnburn
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] editorial: update the ice gathering state: firing icecandidate with null is a legacy hack
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] editorial: 4.3.1 Operation "settled" is not defined
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by burnburn
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.gatheringState: Mismatching types between IDL and description
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do we need a "trackremoved" event?
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCIceTransport.gatheringState: Fix type inconsistency
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do we need a "trackremoved" event?
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do we need a "trackremoved" event?
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do we need a "trackremoved" event?
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Need to describe when ICE and DTLS transport objects are created/changed
- Re: [webrtc-pc] When ICE restarts results in connection to a new endpoint
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Resizing video (fix for Issue 1283)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.gatheringState: Mismatching types between IDL and description
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do we need a "trackremoved" event?
- [webrtc-pc] Ordering of stream "addtrack"/"removetrack" events vs. "track" event
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do we need a "trackremoved" event?
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do we need a "trackremoved" event?
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Select sent codec via "codecPayloadType" field rather than reordering.
Wednesday, 13 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-pc] does MSID still work? (was: example 13: getReceivers semantics)
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Revert "Adding `remoteTrackId` attribute to represent SDP-signaled track ID."
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] End removed tracks remotely again; Make receiver.track nullable instead
- Re: [webrtc-pc] End removed tracks remotely again; Make receiver.track nullable instead
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Do we need a "trackremoved" event?
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Do we need a "trackremoved" event?
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Is bytesReceived really available for RTCRemoteInboundRTPStreamStats?
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Is bytesReceived really available for RTCRemoteInboundRTPStreamStats?
- [webrtc-pc] createDataChannel touches DOM "in the background"
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Checks for negotiation-needed are underspecified when currentLocalDescription/currentRemoteDescription are not set
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Processing Remote MediaStreamTracks should pass on receiver when constructing track event
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Remove event.receiver.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] What algorithms the browser supports
- Re: [webrtc-pc] behaviour of offerToReceive* set to false when there is a local track
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Section 5.3: track.label initialization
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add Promise terms to Terminology section
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Need DSCP information for outgoing RTP streams
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add note that null candidate is for legacy compatibility
- [webrtc-pc] RTCIceTransport.gatheringState: Mismatching types between IDL and description
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy
Tuesday, 12 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats is four dictionaries in one
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Select sent codec via "codecPayloadType" field rather than reordering.
- Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats is four dictionaries in one
- Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats is four dictionaries in one
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Setting local/remote descriptions in succession without waiting for the promises to resolve
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] Setting local/remote descriptions in succession without waiting for the promises to resolve
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: Added Guidelines for getStats() results caching
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Have createOffer call addTransceiver() on offerToReceive.
- Closed: [webrtc-stats] Need implementation advice on caching
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Need implementation advice on caching
- Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats is four dictionaries in one
- Re: [webrtc-stats] RTCMediaStreamTrackStats.concealedAudibleSamples
- [webrtc-stats] Pull Request: keyFramesSent and keyFramesReceived added
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: connectionstate: add missing "one"
- [webrtc-stats] Is bytesReceived really available for RTCRemoteInboundRTPStreamStats?
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Clarify (if needed) how remoteTrackId relates to MSID in the SDP
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by taylor-b
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] setRemoteDescription and ontrack order of events: SRD before ontrack?
Monday, 11 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Ensure that "track" events fire before the SRD promise resolves.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] behaviour of offerToReceive* set to false when there is a local track
- Re: [webrtc-pc] behaviour of offerToReceive* set to false when there is a local track
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Select sent codec via "codecPayloadType" field rather than reordering.
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Select sent codec via "codecPayloadType" field rather than reordering.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] behaviour of offerToReceive* set to false when there is a local track
- Re: [webrtc-pc] behaviour of offerToReceive* set to false when there is a local track
- Re: [webrtc-pc] behaviour of offerToReceive* set to false when there is a local track
- Re: [webrtc-pc] [[associated MediaStreams]] internal slot for RTCRtpSender is not used
- Re: [webrtc-pc] offerToReceive* legacy behaviour spec does not match the behaviour of legacy implementations
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Have createOffer call addTransceiver() on offerToReceive.
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Add some text about how the [[AssociatedMediaStreams]] slot is used
- Re: [webrtc-pc] [[associated MediaStreams]] internal slot for RTCRtpSender is not used
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Use internal slots for transceiver's sender/receiver and receiver's track
- [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpTransceiver should have internal slots for its sender and receiver
- [webrtc-pc] Clarify (if needed) how remoteTrackId relates to MSID in the SDP
Sunday, 10 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-pc] behaviour of offerToReceive* set to false when there is a local track
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: s/RTCTransceiver/RTCRtpTransceiver
- Re: [webrtc-pc] behaviour of offerToReceive* set to false when there is a local track
- [webrtc-pc] behaviour of offerToReceive* set to false when there is a local track
- Re: [webrtc-pc] scaleResolutionDownBy: Specify how the User Agent should behave when scaling video
Friday, 8 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-pc] offerToReceive* legacy behaviour spec does not match the behaviour of legacy implementations
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Use internal slot for RTCRtpSender's track
- [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpReceiver should have an internal slot for its track
- [webrtc-pc] RTCRtpSender should have an internal slot for its track
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCIceTransport: Use internal slots
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: RTCDtlsTransport: Use internal slots
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Have createOffer call addTransceiver() on offerToReceive.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Have createOffer call addTransceiver() on offerToReceive.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Resizing video (fix for Issue 1283)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Resizing video (fix for Issue 1283)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Resizing video (fix for Issue 1283)
Thursday, 7 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-pc] offerToReceive* legacy behaviour spec does not match the behaviour of legacy implementations
- Re: [webrtc-pc] offerToReceive* legacy behaviour spec does not match the behaviour of legacy implementations
- Re: [webrtc-pc] offerToReceive* legacy behaviour spec does not match the behaviour of legacy implementations
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Section 5.2: centering, scaling, cropping
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Is keeping stats around a memory problem?
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Inconsistent setting of receiver.track.readyState violates Mediacapture
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Is keeping stats around a memory problem?
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Add stat to reflect the redundancy of FEC/RED data
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Do the "audio level" stats include MediaStreamTrack volume settings?
- [webrtc-stats] Stats for Audio network adaptation
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Inconsistent setting of receiver.track.readyState violates Mediacapture
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Inconsistent setting of receiver.track.readyState violates Mediacapture
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] "Firing an RTCTrackEvent event named e" is never referenced
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Closed: [webrtc-pc] addIceCandidate may add ice candidate to the wrong remote description
- [webrtc-pc] new commits pushed by aboba
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Have createOffer call addTransceiver() on offerToReceive.
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fixed UA -> user agent.
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Fixed spelling of scaleResolutionDownBy in example.
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Patch for #1564.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] "Firing an RTCTrackEvent event named e" is never referenced
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Editorial: Link to 'Firing a something event' definitions
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Have createOffer call addTransceiver() on offerToReceive.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] "Firing an RTCTrackEvent event named e" is never referenced
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Inconsistent setting of receiver.track.readyState violates Mediacapture
- [webrtc-pc] Inconsistent setting of receiver.track.readyState violates Mediacapture
Wednesday, 6 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-stats] Is keeping stats around a memory problem?
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Have createOffer call addTransceiver() on offerToReceive.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Section 5.2: centering, scaling, cropping
- [webrtc-pc] state internal slot
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Resizing video (fix for Issue 1283)
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Annotate all interfaces with Exposed extended attribute
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces
- [webrtc-pc] Add [Exposed] to all interfaces
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Have createOffer call addTransceiver() on offerToReceive.
Tuesday, 5 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Setting local/remote descriptions in succession without waiting for the promises to resolve
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: Editorial: Remove unreferenced [HTML] ref using respec post processing
Monday, 4 September 2017
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Have createOffer call addTransceiver() on offerToReceive.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] First shot at patch for Issue #1283.
- [webrtc-pc] Pull Request: First shot at patch for Issue #1283.
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy
- Re: [webrtc-pc] Deciding on resolutions with scaleResolutionDownBy