@stefhak Agree that on a browser that supports `addTransceiver` but not `offerToReceive`, `offerToReceive` could be implemented as a shim that called `addTransceiver`. This is also an argument for why `offerToReceive` is more of a convenience than a necessity. Since there isn't an alternative way to support `offerToReceive` that creates `RtpSender`/`RtpReceiver` objects and all the methods that depend on them, if native support for `offerToReceive` is considered problematic, then the best alternative is probably to remove it from the spec and support it via shim if needed. In fact, without an implicit call to `addTransceiver` it is not clear to me how to create RtpSender/RtpReceiver objects and enable methods referencing those objects to function as expected. -- GitHub Notification of comment by aboba Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-pc/pull/1430#issuecomment-327587494 using your GitHub accountReceived on Wednesday, 6 September 2017 19:23:08 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 6 May 2023 21:19:42 UTC