- From: jan-ivar via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 12:28:04 +0000
- To: public-webrtc-logs@w3.org
@henbos I'm not proposing replacing `kind` with a unique type. Dictionaries don't have JS-observable types, so refactoring into 4 dictionaries alone is purely editorial, for a more readable spec. If we don't go for https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-stats/issues/231 then I'm not proposing removing `remoteSource` either. If we *do* go for https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-stats/issues/231 then `remoteSource` disappears naturally (`remoteSource` == `"receiver"`). I'm hoping we do the latter, since I find it intuitive. That's why I left `remoteSource` out in the examples. -- GitHub Notification of comment by jan-ivar Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-stats/issues/230#issuecomment-328837271 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 12 September 2017 12:27:59 UTC