- From: Julee <julee@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:23:03 -0800
- To: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com>
- CC: Webplatform List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Thanks, Max! Yes, it seems like a lot to document. I would let the original project page go, as that was the general proposal, and focus on getting some pages in the /test/ area. When you say ³we are currently in an email list conversing², which email list are you referring to? Do you mean this thread or has another email list popped up? Also, I asked if you¹d be able to attend tomorrow¹s general meeting so we can close in on the import. If not, this email will give us enough to discuss, and we¹ll get status from Renoir on the import issues (caching, I guess). Thanks! Julee ---------------------------- julee@adobe.com @adobejulee -----Original Message----- From: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, November 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM To: julee <julee@adobe.com> Cc: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org> Subject: Re: JS content plan >Hello Julee, > >You asked about the JavaScript page names. > >The issue tracker is useful, I'm beginning to keep it up to date: >http://project.webplatform.org/msdnjs/issues/open > >We are currently in an email list conversing. > >And then there is the project proposal page: >http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript > >Keeping all three up to date feels like fighting Cerberus, the >three-headed hellhound: >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerberus > >While he guards the gates of the Underworld, to prevent those who have >crossed the river Styx from ever escaping, here we are trying to escape >and bring light and freedom to webplatform users in our heroic quest! >:-) For me, I was trying to pull a Bilbo Baggins and sneak by unnoticed >past the threefold attack vector but you caught me. :-| > >My progress is that I was working msjs-3 (issue tracker -- automated >conversion) and ran into a problem with the batch test upload. Renoir >promptly fixed it, so I'm all set to go on an initial upload to the test >wiki, where the pages in their current phase of evolution can be >evaluated. > >You asked: > > I see a couple, such as Date,[2] but that¹s not yours, right? > >Correct, they are there from before. Eventually those would have to be >moved to a new location so as to not overlap, then the content in them >extracted and placed into the existing pages on a case-by-case basis. >That is not this current phase where I'm uploading an early copy for >evaluation. > >My feeling is that seeing the early copy sitting in the test wiki will >give clarity to our discussions more than any abstract discussions about >it can provide. >
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 02:23:42 UTC