W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webplatform@w3.org > November 2013

Re: JS content plan

From: Julee <julee@adobe.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 18:23:03 -0800
To: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com>
CC: Webplatform List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CEB3FEE4.A0E62%julee@adobe.com>
Thanks, Max!

Yes, it seems like a lot to document. I would let the original project
page go, as that was the general proposal, and focus on getting some pages
in the /test/ area.

When you say ³we are currently in an email list conversing², which email
list are you referring to? Do you mean this thread or has another email
list popped up?

Also, I asked if you¹d be able to attend tomorrow¹s general meeting so we
can close in on the import. If not, this email will give us enough to
discuss, and we¹ll get status from Renoir on the import issues (caching, I
guess).

Thanks!

Julee
----------------------------
julee@adobe.com
@adobejulee





-----Original Message-----
From: Max Polk <maxpolk@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, November 21, 2013 at 6:11 PM
To: julee <julee@adobe.com>
Cc: WebPlatform Public List <public-webplatform@w3.org>
Subject: Re: JS content plan

>Hello Julee,
>
>You asked about the JavaScript page names.
>
>The issue tracker is useful, I'm beginning to keep it up to date:
>http://project.webplatform.org/msdnjs/issues/open
>
>We are currently in an email list conversing.
>
>And then there is the project proposal page:
>http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript
>
>Keeping all three up to date feels like fighting Cerberus, the
>three-headed hellhound:
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerberus
>
>While he guards the gates of the Underworld, to prevent those who have
>crossed the river Styx from ever escaping, here we are trying to escape
>and bring light and freedom to webplatform users in our heroic quest!
>:-) For me, I was trying to pull a Bilbo Baggins and sneak by unnoticed
>past the threefold attack vector but you caught me. :-|
>
>My progress is that I was working msjs-3 (issue tracker -- automated
>conversion) and ran into a problem with the batch test upload. Renoir
>promptly fixed it, so I'm all set to go on an initial upload to the test
>wiki, where the pages in their current phase of evolution can be
>evaluated.
>
>You asked:
> > I see a couple, such as Date,[2] but that¹s not yours, right?
>
>Correct, they are there from before. Eventually those would have to be
>moved to a new location so as to not overlap, then the content in them
>extracted and placed into the existing pages on a case-by-case basis.
>That is not this current phase where I'm uploading an early copy for
>evaluation.
>
>My feeling is that seeing the early copy sitting in the test wiki will
>give clarity to our discussions more than any abstract discussions about
>it can provide.
>
Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 02:23:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:13:55 UTC