Re: JS content plan

Hello Julee,

You asked about the JavaScript page names.

The issue tracker is useful, I'm beginning to keep it up to date:
http://project.webplatform.org/msdnjs/issues/open

We are currently in an email list conversing.

And then there is the project proposal page:
http://docs.webplatform.org/wiki/WPD:Projects/javascript

Keeping all three up to date feels like fighting Cerberus, the 
three-headed hellhound:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cerberus

While he guards the gates of the Underworld, to prevent those who have 
crossed the river Styx from ever escaping, here we are trying to escape 
and bring light and freedom to webplatform users in our heroic quest! 
:-) For me, I was trying to pull a Bilbo Baggins and sneak by unnoticed 
past the threefold attack vector but you caught me. :-|

My progress is that I was working msjs-3 (issue tracker -- automated 
conversion) and ran into a problem with the batch test upload. Renoir 
promptly fixed it, so I'm all set to go on an initial upload to the test 
wiki, where the pages in their current phase of evolution can be evaluated.

You asked:
 > I see a couple, such as Date,[2] but that’s not yours, right?

Correct, they are there from before. Eventually those would have to be 
moved to a new location so as to not overlap, then the content in them 
extracted and placed into the existing pages on a case-by-case basis. 
That is not this current phase where I'm uploading an early copy for 
evaluation.

My feeling is that seeing the early copy sitting in the test wiki will 
give clarity to our discussions more than any abstract discussions about 
it can provide.

Received on Friday, 22 November 2013 02:12:25 UTC