- From: David Kirstein <frozenice@frozenice.de>
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 10:15:22 +0200
- To: "'Julee'" <julee@adobe.com>, <public-webplatform@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <037801ce4d56$84c43360$8e4c9a20$@frozenice.de>
Hi, Mike moved the page from css/functions/* to css/properties/* ("I moved the page. I assume this resolves it."). But that's only half the work :) It was using the CSS_Function Form und therefore put into the CSS_Functions category, this doesn't change when a page is moved. You would need to manually change the source to use the correct Form (just putting the page in the correct category should be enough). Once it uses the correct form on edit, just remove / edit stuff from the old form that didn't automatically fit into the new form. I saw Mike completely replaced the page (which is also a way to do it), so I guess #44 is resolved? A general way to identify pages, that use the wrong form (I guess this is what you mean by "have broken templates"), could maybe only work by comparing article paths with the actual form used, e.g. check if every page under css/properties/* uses the CSS_Property form. "Using a template correctly" is hard to find out, everything should be OK when editing pages through the forms. Maybe check if the free text field at the bottom of the form has some gibberish in it, but that can't be done programmatically. -fro Von: Julee [mailto:julee@adobe.com] Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Mai 2013 02:14 An: public-webplatform@w3.org Betreff: Can we find which pages have broken templates? Hi, all you smart MediaWiki folks out there: Do you know if there's a way to programmatically identify which pages have broken templates? Or maybe validate that a page has used a template correctly? Thanks for any ideas, here. Julee ---------------------------- julee@adobe.com @adobejulee From: Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013 10:48 AM To: julee <julee@adobe.com>, Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com> Subject: Re: I assigned you WPD bug http://project.webplatform.org/content/issues/44 For #45, I just moved the page. I assume that resolves it, so I closed the bug. For #44, would probably just use the much better "animation" page to clobber the much worse "transition" page. But I've seen similar problems before, and don't know enough about templates to find out which is applied to a given page, or how to apply a different one to an existing page if possible. Templates seem to get corrupted so easily. Is there any way to programatically detect any that don't parse? --Mike S On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Julee <julee@adobe.com> wrote: And related bug: http://project.webplatform.org/content/issues/45 J ---------------------------- julee@adobe.com @adobejulee From: julee <julee@adobe.com> Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013 9:55 AM To: Mike Sierra <letmespellitoutforyou@gmail.com> Subject: I assigned you WPD bug http://project.webplatform.org/content/issues/44 Hi, Mike: We're trying to get to beta, so I thought you could help us out with this one: http://project.webplatform.org/content/issues/44
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Friday, 10 May 2013 08:15:48 UTC