Re: Fwd: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon: Thursday, 28 September 2006

Hi Lofton,

> We will take a look at this.  In the particular case of E.4, I actually 
> changed "viewers" in an earlier draft to "implementations", because I 
> realized that the suggestions would require the cooperation of authoring 

> tools as well.
> 
> This also may apply to some other "viewers" occurrences.  We'll have a 
look.

I agree with your direction. "implementations" is better.

Best regards,
---
Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM Japan
Tel: +81-46-215-4659
E-mail: kentarou@jp.ibm.com

Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com> wrote on 2006/09/28 23:28:43:

> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for your contributions.  One comment on your latest suggestion...
> 
> At 10:48 PM 9/28/2006 +0900, Kentarou Fukuda wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm sorry I couldn't attend the meeting today, but I have one small
> >editorial suggestion.
> >
> >The word "implementations" is used in E.4. But in other parts, "viewer" 
is
> >used for WebCGM implementations.
> >I think it will be better that we select one from them.
> 
> We will take a look at this.  In the particular case of E.4, I actually 
> changed "viewers" in an earlier draft to "implementations", because I 
> realized that the suggestions would require the cooperation of authoring 

> tools as well.
> 
> This also may apply to some other "viewers" occurrences.  We'll have a 
look.
> 
> Best,
> -Lofton.
> 
> 
> >Thank you very much for your efforts for the appendix.
> >
> >Best regards,
> >---
> >Kentarou Fukuda, Ph.D.
> >Tokyo Research Laboratory, IBM Japan
> >Tel: +81-46-215-4659
> >E-mail: kentarou@jp.ibm.com
> >
> >Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@ieee.org> wrote on 2006/09/28 04:03:30:
> >
> > > At 11:44 AM -0600 9/27/06, Lofton Henderson wrote:
> > > >Hi Al,
> > > >
> > > >Here is our agenda for Thursday.  Please let us know if you think
> > > >you need to attend or not.  As I noted before the "Agenda", you 
(WAI
> > > >PF) endorsed the appendix content preceding the addition of the new
> > > >Styling section, so this would seem to be a matter of whether 
you're
> > > >happy with the Styling addition.
> > > >
> > > >Attendance is welcome of course, but probably not needed if you are
> > > >satisfied with the appendix now.
> > >
> > > I will plan to attend.  Hopefully this agenda item will be limited 
to
> > > mutual congratulations and thanks.
> > > But I'll plan to be there just in case any new ideas come in.
> > >
> > > I have already given my
> > >
> > > - endorsement in substance
> > > http://www.w3.org/mid/p0611040ec1406cde468e@%5B10.0.1.3%5D
> > >
> > > - cavil in detail
> > > 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0097.html
> > >
> > > I don't think that Kentarou can be there but I want to thank him for
> > > what he contributed
> > > without which we wouldn't have got here.
> > >
> > > Al
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >Cheers,
> > > >-Lofton.
> > > >
> > > >>Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:09:39 -0600
> > > >>To: WebCGM WG <public-webcgm-wg@w3.org>
> > > >>From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
> > > >>Subject: [Agenda] WebCGM telecon:  Thursday, 28 September 2006
> > > >>[...]
> > > >>
> > > >>Dear friends of WebCGM WG,
> > > >>
> > > >>This is the regular weekly WG teleconference. If you can't attend,
> > > >>please reply (to list) with "regrets":
> > > >>
> > > >>WebCGM, Thursday, 28 September 2006, 11:00am-12:30pm ET
> > > >>(logistics below, following agenda)
> > > >>
> > > >>[Note.  The WAI PF folks may join us.  If they are happy with 
App.E
> > > >>([2]) now, it is probably not necessary.  Per [6], this would
> > > >>depend on whether WAI endorse the brief new "Styling" section, E.4
> > > >>.]
> > > >>
> > > >>Agenda
> > > >>=====
> > > >>
> > > >>Previous minutes:
> > > 
>>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0045.html
> > > >>
> > > >>Scribe:  Dave
> > > >>(See:
> > > >>[0]
> >http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/scribing-guidelines.html )
> > > >>
> > > >>1.) roll call 11:00am ET, membership, agenda
> > > >>         - WAI PF may attend, as needed
> > > >>
> > > >>2.) routine WG business
> > > >>         - any?
> > > >>
> > > >>3.) should WG reply to CDF?  [7]
> > > >>
> > > >>4.) WAI appendix
> > > >>         - consensus version of new "Styling" section [1]
> > > >>         - references for PR text? [1]
> > > >>         - WebCGM proposed final text for appendix [2]
> > > >>         - WAI endorse [2] now, w/ styling add'n? (see also [6])
> > > >>         - WG vote to approve [2] for PR text
> > > >>
> > > >>5.) During CR & moving to PR
> > > >>         - the patent exclusion brohaha [9]
> > > >>         - implementations & TS (features at risk) [8]
> > > >>         - preliminary implementation report [3]
> > > >>         - publish TS -- when to do it?
> > > >>         - looking forward after 10/6: steps for PR transition [4]
> > > >>         - post-PR-transition:  OASIS lock-step coordination
> > > >>
> > > >>6.) Press Release and Testimonials [5]
> > > >>         - WG Members to Provide Testimonials for REC version
> > > >>         - Draft Press Release by Web CGM WG
> > > >>
> > > >>7.) Others ?
> > > >>
> > > >>Logistics
> > > >>----------
> > > >>Zakim bridge +1 617-761-6200 (US) or +33.4.89.06.34.99 (France)
> > > >>code: 932246 ("WEBCGM")
> > > >>IRC, channel #webcgm
> > > >>
> > > >>http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/Group/Overview.html
> > > >>
> > > >>Regards,
> > > >>Thierry
> > > >>
> > > >>[1]
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0091.html
> > > >>[2] http://www.w3.org/Graphics/WebCGM/WG/2006/wai-appendix-V3.html
> > > >>[3] 
http://www.w3.org/2006/Graphics/WebCGM/implementation-report.html
> > > >>[4] http://www.w3.org/2005/08/transition?docstatus=pr-tr
> > > >>[5]
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0054.html
> > > >>[6]
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0055.html
> > > >>[7]
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0071.html
> > > >>[8]
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0080.html
> > > >>
> > > >>[9a]
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webcgm-wg/2006Sep/0090.html
> > > >>[9b] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/39256/webcgm2006/
> > >
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 28 September 2006 15:58:28 UTC